Related
Warning : this article talk about domestic violence and murder .
Netflix ’s novel documentary film seriesAmerican Manhunt : O. J. Simpsonexplores the infamous case in a new light . The series uses interviews and archival footage from the trial and the events surrounding it . American Manhuntoutlines the events of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman ’s decease , the police response to the crime , O. J. Simpson ’s trial for the murders , and the magnanimous wallop on American civilization that the events had . As one of the most well - known court case of all time , the Netflix boob tube seriesdoes a good Book of Job of trace all the most important element of the run .
American Manhunt : O. J. Simpson ’s liberal strength is its use of interviews with many of the citizenry necessitate in the typeface from both the prosecution and the defense . By including individuals from both side along with a juror on the case and the sister of one of the victims , the honest crime documentary series does give a clean well - rounded perspective . Though the case is so well - be intimate that many viewers belike already know many of the main arguments made , the docuseries does bring to light several big reveals that are impactful .
10Several Witnesses Were Never Called To The Stand
Their Testimonies Could Have Changed Jury Opinions
The OJ Simpson face had a lot of evidence , but at the end of the day , the biggest factor in the trial actually ended up being the witnesses used and how the two side questioned them . On the whole , the defense did a much well task at using witnesser to their reward , and to this item , there were several witnesses that could have helped the prosecution that they select not to bring to the stand at all . In particular , the two witnesses who share their stories in Netflix ’s documentary series both saw OJ the nighttime that the execution occurred but were never asked to testify .
While it is ill-defined the exact impact that these witnesses could have had , they in all probability would have assist in support the criminal prosecution ’s timeline .
The first witness , Jill Shively , was driving home when she saw O. J. Simpson driving away from his x - married woman ’s neighborhood , place him near the scene of the law-breaking at the veracious time . Shively later betray her story , so Marcia Clark thought that she would not be a very believable witness . Skip Junis , who witness Simpson arrive at LAX play oddly , was also never called to testify . While it is ill-defined the accurate impact that these witness could have had , they in all likelihood would have aided in corroborating the prosecution ’s timeline .
9Ron Goldman Was In The Wrong Place At The Wrong Time
The Docuseries Features Interviews With Goldman’s Sister
Despite being a murder case , very little attention is often paid to the victims in discourse of the O. J. Simpson run because of Simpson ’s celebrity . While the Netflix documentary necessarily has to give a detailed schema of the case , one authoritative point that the series does remind viewer of is the whiteness of the victim and the impact that the murders had on their families . In special , the series makes it very clear that Ron Goldman was in the incorrect post at the ill-timed sentence , with several interviewee even positing that he had undertake to save up Nicole Brown Simpson .
Many of the best on-key crime documentaries are n’t produced as a series but as a feature film - duration format that makes for an epic and enchanting watch .
Goldman was Quaker with Brown Simpson and had gone to her business firm to drop off a pair of glasses that her female parent had leave at the restaurant where he worked . This , unfortunately , placed him at her house at the time of the crime . Both death were improbably tragical , and audience with Goldman ’s sister help the docudrama continuously reap focussing back to them rather than solely on the court case that became a medium frenzy .
8Several Pieces Of Physical Evidence Were Never Collected By Police
The Supplies Had Been Tampered With
In the first installment ofAmerican Manhunt : O. J. Simpson , several of the LAPD detectives who were on the case outlined how they believe that other detective and law-breaking scene analysts at the scene had failed to properly tag and admit certain object into the official grounds in the case . There was a wealthiness of grounds at the conniption , butbecause the police force regard in the investigation never amply compared annotation , some of it was lost or tampered with . The docuseries points to medical supply in Brown Simpson ’s house that had been tampered with and wash that was still wet and could have render DNA .
Perhaps the most celebrated grounds that overshadow the case is the duad of gloves that were split between the murder scene and Simpson ’s household . Even these fall under mistrust of meddling . Likewise , though detective Mark Fuhrman made line of the scene , his notes were supposedly never read by the other investigator on the case , meaning thatall the law were not even on the same page . Notably , despite the vast amount of forcible evidence at the scene , the murder arm was never found .
7DNA Evidence From Inside And Outside The House Was Not Collected
Additionally, The Evidence Was Not Managed Properly
In outlining the crime and the appearance of the offence scene , one of the biggest affair thatAmerican Manhunthighlights is that a wad of DNA evidence was not collected by police at the time . The docuseries shows persona of blood on abstemious replacement and threshold toff , which it take down that officers did not amass . Additionally , the washing that was still plastered and in the washer was not examined at all . These major supervision could have in spades help oneself show whose profligate and DNA were in the house and outside .
The Netflix serial points to tough communicating between the detectives and their want of good notes or picture as a major problem for the investigation .
Though there was a sight of deoxyribonucleic acid collected for testing , the defence later reason that it could have been foul , think of thatany additional DNA that was collected at the offset could have try helpful . to boot , the Netflix serial points to unfit communication between the detectives and their want of near bill or depiction as a major problem for the investigating . While there were only three DNA profile associated with the line of descent that was test , collecting further samples from other locations around the crime scene and Simpson ’s theater could have further bespeak what happened that night .
6Simpson’s Initial Interview With The Police Was Not Used In Court
The Interview Had A Lot Of Inconsistencies
After Simpson returned to Los Angeles from Chicago and was fully informed of the situation environ his wife ’s death , he was interviewed by the LAPD . While segment of the audience are used in the documentary serial , the interview was never used in court . Throughout it , Simpson was not able to give any coherent answers about his whereabouts that night or what had take place since then .
Netflix has many critically lauded documentary to check out but the filmy phone number is overpowering . Which are the best to check out first ?
One big question mark for the police was that Simpson had a slice on his left hand which would have been ordered with the drops of bloodline at the crime picture , as the bloody footprints exit the prospect had drops of blood on the left side of them . However , O. J. Simpson was ineffective to give a clear answer about how he had skip his hand , either to the constabulary or to his friends after . He instead say that he cut it before he left for Chicago or that he disregard it in his hotel room in Chicago , but none of his stories have even truly been shew one way or another .
5The Documentary Casts Doubt On Mark Fuhrman
His Racism Cast Doubt On Everything He Had Said About The Case
WhileAmerican Manhunt : O. J. Simpsoninitially draw up Mark Fuhrman as one of the principal interviewee for the serial , as the show shape up it becomes clear that he was in reality a major job in the casing . His office and testimony are certainly one of the most ill-famed parts of the case , asFuhrman was the only someone in the O. J. Simpson test actually convicted . However , American Manhuntmakes the extent of his natural action and their implications quartz clear because his racism influenced the entire outcome of the case .
When Fuhrman returned during the defensive structure ’s showcase , he make the twenty percent for all the big interrogative sentence , including whether he had ever falsify a police force report or planted grounds , making him look guilty of something .
The defense fetch Fuhrman ’s name up at trial to point to his racial discrimination as a factor in Simpson ’s arrest . These allegation add up up when he first take the pedestal as a spectator for the prosecution . When Fuhrman returned during the defense ’s case , he took the fifth for all the big questions , including whether he had ever falsified a police written report or planted grounds , get him calculate hangdog of something . While in his interviews for the docuseries , Fuhrman is adamant that he never falsify a report , it certainly was not a good view for the LAPD to be in .
4The Jury Selection Took 2 Months
They Interviewed 257 People
The nature of the caseful and O.J. ’s fame ensured that people knew about the trial run proceed in , which made it very hard to choose the juryman . Because so many masses had been following the subject prior to the trial , it was unmanageable to find jurors who would be able to give an indifferent decision . take the jury ultimately took two months and 257 people were interview before the pursuance and defense had admit enough jurywoman and backups .
The trial was held in Downtown Los Angeles rather than in Santa Monica , where it had occur , to gain a more various jury , whom the defense justifiedly believe would be more likely to side with Simpson . The defense believed that Black jurors would be more likely to feel Simpson not guilty , and the prosecution believe that charwoman would be more probable to find him guilty . This lead in the juror being mostly woman and mostly Black .
3The Prosecution Had A Hard Time Getting The Jury To Believe The DNA Evidence
The Science Was Still So New And People Were Skeptical
Because the trial was the very beginning of when deoxyribonucleic acid evidence analysis was being used , many people were not very intimate with it , include the panel and some of the crime scene analyst . This meant that detectives miss important things that could have solidify the desoxyribonucleic acid grounds even more . base on the DNA that was tested , Nicole Brown Simpson , Ron Goldman , and O.J. Simpson ’s deoxyribonucleic acid were present both at Brown Simpson ’s house and Simpson ’s house . Though this seemed like it would conclusively link Simpson to the crime , the defense was capable to argue against it .
Since Marcia Clark largely argued the case from the standpoint of skill and fact , her event was often not as compelling as Johnnie Cochran , who argued his points through the worked up connexion he could make with the jurors .
Because some of theofficials ferment on the crime setting had not been properly trained , they contaminated the criminal offense scene in various ways . American Manhunthighlights that gloves were not always used , and rakehell sample were not always ravish in the right agency , among other issues . Additionally , since Marcia Clark for the most part argued the subject from the standpoint of science and facts , her showcase was often not as compelling as Johnnie Cochran , who argue his points through the emotional connection he could produce with the jurors .
2The Defense Used An Argument Of Evidence Planting
Trouble With The Los Angeles Police Was A Huge Factor In The Case
Along with the defense ’s title that the assembling of the DNA evidence was done wrongly and contaminated the findings , they also alleged that the LAPD was actually behind framing O. J. Simpson . The defense claim that Mark Fuhrman had move the second mitt from Nicole Brown Simpson ’s house to O. J. Simpson ’s house and had hidden it behind his client bungalows . The docuseries alleges that Simpson ’s team used Fuhrman ’s noted racial discrimination to give him a motivation to put O. J. Simpson .
While there are plenty of genuine law-breaking shows presently streaming , there are also many traditional crime dramatic play that true crime fans will savour .
Beyond Fuhrman ’s alleged meddling , which has been find to be totally mistaken , the defense team also speculate that another official on the font , Vannatter , had carry a vial of Simpson ’s blood to the crime scene in parliamentary procedure to constitute evidence there . This has also been proven false . Whilethese two claims are all idle based on the grounds of the case and subsequent investigations into the officers in doubt , the claims were efficient in drawing attention away from the slaying and towards a likely police cover - up .
1After The Criminal Case, The Victims' Families Brought Forward A Civil Case
Unlike The Criminal Case, The Civil Case Prosecution Won
While the criminal court font was the trial that garnered the most attention , after O. J. Simpson was acquitted there , he had to go back to test in a civil vitrine . The case was take forward by the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman for wrongful death . In the civil case , further notice of Simpson ’s domestic abuse was entered into evidence and the evaluator did not allow the defence to apply the same contestation about the LAPD ’s racism . to boot , Simpson testify , but he was ineffective to answer even basic questions . He was find creditworthy for their deaths .
Kim Goldman , Ron Goldman ’s sister , state inAmerican Manhuntthat her family never receive any of the money they were owed from O. J. Simpson .
